<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 1970 rule strikes again: Virtual Platform Principles in 1967</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/130/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/130?&#038;owa_medium=feed&#038;owa_sid=</link>
	<description>Computer Technology: Simulation, Virtualization, Virtual Platforms, Embedded, Multicore and Multiprocessing (by Jakob Engblom)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:54:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observations from Uppsala &#187; S4D 2010</title>
		<link>http://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-2970</link>
		<dc:creator>Observations from Uppsala &#187; S4D 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakob.engbloms.se/?p=130#comment-2970</guid>
		<description>[...] During the SystemC parts of his talk he did say a few things that I did not quite agree with&#8230; in particular that TLM was unknown prior to 1999. It was not called that, but it certainly existed in the field of full-system simulation. The main problem is that Thorsten only sees the EDA history of modeling, not the computer architecture and software-driven work that did simulations as far back as 1950 (the famous Gill paper), and fast simulation since at least 1967. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] During the SystemC parts of his talk he did say a few things that I did not quite agree with&#8230; in particular that TLM was unknown prior to 1999. It was not called that, but it certainly existed in the field of full-system simulation. The main problem is that Thorsten only sees the EDA history of modeling, not the computer architecture and software-driven work that did simulations as far back as 1950 (the famous Gill paper), and fast simulation since at least 1967. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observations from Uppsala &#187; Additional Notes on Transporting Bugs with Checkpoints</title>
		<link>http://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-2954</link>
		<dc:creator>Observations from Uppsala &#187; Additional Notes on Transporting Bugs with Checkpoints</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakob.engbloms.se/?p=130#comment-2954</guid>
		<description>[...] is also a paper from 1969 that I wrote about a few years ago that does include the idea of recording and replaying asynchronous external inputs to a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is also a paper from 1969 that I wrote about a few years ago that does include the idea of recording and replaying asynchronous external inputs to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observations from Uppsala &#187; The TLM DAC</title>
		<link>http://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>Observations from Uppsala &#187; The TLM DAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakob.engbloms.se/?p=130#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>[...] I want to point out that TLM is not just SystemC. TLM is a general idea that has been in active use since the late 1960s. It is the obvious way to model a computer, if all you are concerned about is how it looks to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I want to point out that TLM is not just SystemC. TLM is a general idea that has been in active use since the late 1960s. It is the obvious way to model a computer, if all you are concerned about is how it looks to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob</title>
		<link>http://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-1622</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 07:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakob.engbloms.se/?p=130#comment-1622</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  I actually have that paper, it is quite brilliant what they do in some 30 machine instructions :)  I was more looking for sources that address the more complex machines of the 1960s, especially with multiple processors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  I actually have that paper, it is quite brilliant what they do in some 30 machine instructions <img src='http://jakob.engbloms.se/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I was more looking for sources that address the more complex machines of the 1960s, especially with multiple processors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Martin</title>
		<link>http://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/130/comment-page-1#comment-1621</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jakob.engbloms.se/?p=130#comment-1621</guid>
		<description>Jakob

Try to find the chapter Steve Leibson wrote in the &quot;Electronic Design Automation for Integrated Circuits Handbook&quot; (CRC/Taylor and Francis, 2006) - it&#039;s in Volume I, &quot;EDA for IC System Design, Verification and Testing&quot;.  In this chapter, called &quot;Using performance metrics to select microprocessor cores for IC designs&quot;, (chapter 10), Steve talks about EDSAC from the University of Cambridge, developed by a team led by Maurice Wilkes.   EDSAC had an instruction set simulator (the earliest one Steve could find out about); the ISS was described in a paper from 1951!  - S. Gill,  &quot;The diagnosis of mistakes in programmes on the EDSAC&quot;, Proceedings of the Royal Society Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 22, 1951, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 538-554.  According to Steve&#039;s writeup (I have not read the paper myself), the paper describes a tracing simulator for the instruction set.   Perhaps this could be argued to be the first &quot;virtual platform&quot;, albeit of a computer that was rather simpler (but much larger) than today&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jakob</p>
<p>Try to find the chapter Steve Leibson wrote in the &#8220;Electronic Design Automation for Integrated Circuits Handbook&#8221; (CRC/Taylor and Francis, 2006) &#8211; it&#8217;s in Volume I, &#8220;EDA for IC System Design, Verification and Testing&#8221;.  In this chapter, called &#8220;Using performance metrics to select microprocessor cores for IC designs&#8221;, (chapter 10), Steve talks about EDSAC from the University of Cambridge, developed by a team led by Maurice Wilkes.   EDSAC had an instruction set simulator (the earliest one Steve could find out about); the ISS was described in a paper from 1951!  &#8211; S. Gill,  &#8220;The diagnosis of mistakes in programmes on the EDSAC&#8221;, Proceedings of the Royal Society Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 22, 1951, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 538-554.  According to Steve&#8217;s writeup (I have not read the paper myself), the paper describes a tracing simulator for the instruction set.   Perhaps this could be argued to be the first &#8220;virtual platform&#8221;, albeit of a computer that was rather simpler (but much larger) than today&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

