I am probably among the last people to have tried Spotify. When the service first arrived ten years ago I looked at it and concluded it seemed a poor match for my needs. To me, music is something you buy and own permanently in the style of old-fashioned CDs. The whole idea of a streaming service where an artist, album, or song could go missing all of sudden due to factors beyond your control just seemed (and still seems) suspicious. Everybody else seemed to love it, but that does not necessarily mean it is good… However, I finally did jump in and try Spotify, and here is what I found.
At the Right Price, even a Curmudgeon can be Convinced
The reason I finally tried Spotify is that since both kids wanted Spotify Premium accounts it was cheaper to go for a family plan – which covers up to six people in the same household. As a result, I was suddenly a Spotify Premium user, and since it literally did not cost me anything, I decided to finally try it.
Overall, the content is impressive, but I am less impressed by the application and the organizational tools at your disposal.
My point of comparison is my personal music library composed of music collected since the early days of MP3s around the turn of the millennium – in total some 12000 files, many of them with custom tagging and genre markings. Some ripped from CDs, and quite a few bought as digital downloads, first from Apple iTunes and more recently from Google Play Music (when I stopped using iPods to play music a few years ago I decided to finally cut the cord to the Apple ecosystem entirely).
On my computers I play music using the Music Bee player, which also has excellent tools for working with tags and metadata in music files. It took quite a while to find a good music player for my phone, but I have finally found one I really like: Blackplayer EX. Google’s own Android Music application is not very impressive.
The Content is Great
The really good thing about Spotify is the content. Not just the availability of most of the music you might imagine playing, but also things like playlists set up by other people and Spotify Radio. It does indeed live up to the initial vision of having all the world’s music available legally and immediately, like the Spotify founder Daniel Ek explained in an episode of the Freakonomics podcast.
The search function works really well, and I like that you can dive into artists, songs, or albums. For some reason, this works a lot better than Google Music… with Spotify, finding all songs with the same title is easy (i.e., hunting for covers). With Google Music, you just end up somewhere weird and useless.
A biproduct of having everything available to stream without additional per-item costs is that it is really easy to jump around through the universe of music on Spotify and see what you find. You can check out a new album and give it a try in a way that would not be possible if I had to buy the album first to sample it. That is an obvious property of a streaming service, but it is probably one of the most important differences to the traditional way of unit-based buying of music.
I have a huge love for cover versions of songs I like, the stranger the better. Spotify has turned into a great resource to indulge in this. For example, I did a search on “Personal Jesus”. Which turned up a version by Di Leva, which led me to his Album Lovestar, which in turn contained a wonderful or awful cover of ABBA’s The Winner Takes it All… It is a bit like following chains of links on Wikipedia, where you never know what you will learn at the next turn.
The availability of shared playlists from other users on the platform offers another great source of discovery. For example, keeping up with the Personal Jesus theme, I stumbled on this collection of a ton of covers of that particular song:
One aspect of the content that I find less impressive is actually the metadata about the songs. For music created in recent years it seems that information about composers and similar is in decent shape. But for older tracks, it can be a bit sketchy:
For some reason, information like year of release is attached to the Album a song belongs to, and not to the song itself. For collections of songs, it makes more sense to include the original release date of the song I would think… This is clearly an area where I think Spotify could improve. In all fairness, there are some decent artist biographies to be found in the Spotify platform, and I guess there is no point in becoming a Wikipedia of information… that function is already fulfilled by the real Wikipedia.
The synchronization of Spotify across different devices and the web interface is probably the best I have ever seen. I guess it helps that we are talking about very little actual data stored on the device – handling a hundred gigabytes of information that is selectively downloaded to different machines based on local needs and storage capacities is arguably asking for more complexity than what Spotify does. Still, just having playlists and what I am currently playing seamlessly sync between web, desktop app, and phone is impressive.
One area where I Spotify to be a bit disappointing is in the organizational tools that it offers. I cannot really see how you could build a music collection (I guess, virtual collection since you do not own anything) with it. It is really hard to catalogue and categorize things – all you can do is to like songs and create playlists.
But I would like to be able to do much more than that.
Why does Spotify not offer users the ability to rate songs on a scale from zero to five like all MP3-based tools do? And why can’t I add my own tags to songs and use them in queries to built algorithm-driven playlists? Like “all the Christmas songs that I have given four or five stars”?
There is no way to mark a song as “this looks interesting, I will check it out later” like the “Watch Later” function on YouTube. I definitely think the “like” of a song should be separate from “I have it in my library”.
The history function is decidedly odd. Instead of presenting me with a straight list of the previous songs I have played (like YouTube’s history function), I get a list of albums from which I have recently played songs. That is not particularly helpful if an interesting song went by at a time where it was not possible to use the app to mark it as good (like when listening with your hands full of something else). This makes it a lot harder to make use of Spotify as a discovery function, since music can just fly by and be very hard to find afterwards. There should be a straight simple song history.
Simplicity taken too Far
Maybe I was not expecting the right things, but I did find the Spotify user interface to be a bit too simple for my taste. At least on the phone App, too many things are hidden several clicks away instead of adding direct-access buttons to the main UI. Compare Spotify:
With my customized Blackplayer setup featuring buttons in all corners of the UI, a star rating slider, and a volume control.
I would not call this particularly busy, but it puts a lot more useful functionality directly on the now-playing screen. I think mobile apps should be more like this: add clear buttons for functions, rather than trying to be minimalist and hide things behind swipes in different directions on different UI elements. Blackplayer is also great since it allows you to change the buttons displayed on the screen, which is something I think Spotify should do too.
The “Queue” functionality in Spotify (across platforms, but especially on the mobile App) seems totally broken. It might start playing from the queue, but then suddenly it moves into an Album, or onto a playlist. Swiping left (from the right) on the cover art will move to the next song in the queue… but swiping right does not go back into the queue, instead it also goes to some playlist or album I recently visited. History gets lost.
The logical system would be to maintain a persistent history, and having swipe right and left always move back and forward through this history until you reach the end of it. Most other music player apps I have used have worked like that. Inside a playlist it seems to work, but not when mixing the Queue with playlists.
I will likely keep using Spotify as a way to discover music. It is really useful as a way to share discoveries with other people, since most people I know seem to have Spotify accounts anyway. It is really impressive to indeed have most of the music in the world available immediately and without added cost.
But the overall impression is of a rather impersonal system in some way. It is hard to make Spotify your own – it really feels like the content creators have a bit too much to say, and there is too little room for users to change metadata around songs to suit their needs and preferences.
It is also a bit too simplistic in the user interface and data model – there is clearly so much more that could be done to create a sophisticated music organization tool. Spotify is way behind even the early-2000s file-based music players when it comes to organizing things.
One service I would like is to be able to actually buy permanent downloads of songs from Spotify directly, so that I can retain access to the music if I decide to stop paying Spotify or if (when) Spotify disappears from the market. I have been using computers and various services for long enough that I know that unless I have a copy on my own personal hard drives, I will lose access somehow. Music is a bit too important to trust to a fleeting engagement with a company that can remove access to it any day.
Right now, I will likely discover things on Spotify and buy the permanent downloads from Google, crazy as it sounds. Downloaded music files also work in cases like the SD card in the not-at-all-connected car we have.